This heretical perversion must be soundly rejected, but the inclusion of spiritual equality on that list has troubled some Christians I would like to square that particular circle.
The meaning of the term “equality” morphed over the years, first into legal equality (sans a spiritual connection), and eventually into practical equality – the equality of outcome. It rejects the idea of equality for the same reason it rejects the ideas of unicorns and leprechauns, noting that human equality does not exist in any observable scientific, legal, material, intellectual, sexual, or spiritual form. It opposes all groups who work for globalist ideals or globalist objectives.Īnti-globalist should not be understood as an extreme form of isolationism global dialogue is both necessary and good, but in its present manifestation it is nothing more than an attempt to subvert national sovereignty.ħ. Nationalism must be balanced with consideration of others, especially in an era where the entire world is only twelve hours away by flight, and immediately accessible through the Internet.Ħ. It should be cautioned, however, that should nationalism arise, these same interests will try and pervert it into jingoism, so that the resultant bloodshed can be leveraged into a new attempt at pacifistic tyranny. The Globalist agenda seeks to turn humans into fungible assets – nothing more than corporate human resources – and the preservation of unique cultures and nations is paramount if we wish to avoid the horrors of utopia. It supports all nationalisms and the right of all nations to exist, homogeneous and unadulterated by foreign invasion and immigration. The Alt Right is openly and avowedly nationalist. The Alt Right believes Western civilization is the pinnacle of human achievement and supports its three foundational pillars: Christianity, the European nations, and the Graeco-Roman legacy.Įlsewhere I have heard this described as the spiritual unity of Christianity, the foundation of reason and Law from the Graeco-Roman tradition, and the principle of individual freedom which came from the barbarian tribes.ĥ. Peterson observed, the evil father (patriarchy) must be overcome, redeemed, and reinvented by each generation – it must not be destroyed, and it cannot be perfected.Ĥ. Any political philosophy which aims for a permanent state of affairs will inevitably fail. “Harmony” is the crucial term here the world is an organic whole with a cyclic nature. The Alt Right believes in victory through persistence and remaining in harmony with science, reality, cultural tradition, and the lessons of history. It is a forward-thinking philosophy of offense, in every sense of that term. The Alt Right is not a defensive attitude and rejects the concept of noble and principled defeat. Attempting to build policy off of Libertarian principles results in Libertinism, and eventual tyranny.ģ. Libertarianism is an effect, not a cause, of a well ordered society. It is also an alternative to libertarianism. The Alt Right is an ALTERNATIVE to the mainstream conservative movement in the USA that is nominally encapsulated by Russel Kirk’s 10 Conservative Principles, but in reality has devolved towards progressivism. Neocons are best understood as Neo-Trotskyists, the dialectical response to Neo-Liberal Democrats, whose inevitable synthesis is Globalist Stalinism under the influence of figures such as George Soros.Ģ. Communists, Marxists, Marxians, cultural Marxists, and neocons are not Alt Right. The Alt Right is of the political right in both the American and the European sense of the term. His sixteen points, with commentary, are:ġ. I prefer to think of myself as a Catholic Medievalist when it comes to political theory, but as far as contemporary politics go, I happily endorse Vox Day’s definitions. I think it is an excellent summation new movements without guiding principles will inevitably fall prey to subversive entryists with pre-established agendas, and his sixteen points serve as a bulwark against that.
Around the same time, Vox Day described the movement in sixteen points as a starting point to guide future growth. Back in August, I wrote an introduction to the Alt Right geared towards those who were immersed in the mainstream an explanation of why the new generation of political thinkers has deviated so greatly from traditional discourse.
0 kommentar(er)
